Engagement-scoped AI Insurance Readiness assessments operated against the published AIRS v1.1 Standard — for institutions whose AI systems are subject to insurance underwriting, regulatory examination, or fiduciary attestation.
AIRS engagements serve institutions whose AI exposure intersects regulatory examination, insurance underwriting, or fiduciary duty.
Carriers, banks, healthcare systems, and asset managers — institutions whose AI systems are examined by regulators.
Carriers, brokers, reinsurers, and captives writing or ceding AI risk.
Asset managers, pension funds, GPs, and LPs with AI in their investment process.
AIRS engagements are scoped by domain coverage and evidence depth. The published AIRS Standard organizes AI risk across five domains; tier selection reflects the breadth of domains in scope and the depth of evidence collection required.
Focused single-factor or single-control diagnostic · directional AIRS indication · short-form analyst memo highlighting priority remediation areas.
Single-domain assessment · documentation review and AIRS scoring · written assessment letter with domain-level remediation roadmap.
Single-domain assessment · documentation, structured interviews, and evidence collection · AIRS scoring with weighted domain output · executive briefing.
Multi-domain or full five-domain assessment · regulatory crosswalk attestation (NIST · ISO · NAIC · EU AI Act) · board-grade summary.
Multi-entity or portfolio-level engagement · cross-subsidiary scope · multi-jurisdictional regulatory attestation · custom corpus development.
Each AIRS engagement delivers three institutional artifacts, suitable for board review, regulatory examination, and procurement of AI insurance products.
A composite AIRS score on a 0–100 scale, accompanied by an insurance readiness label aligned to the AIRS v1.1 Standard. The verdict is the institutional deliverable.
A regulatory crosswalk package mapping the assessment to NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, the NAIC Model Bulletin, and EU AI Act obligations — designed for direct submission to procurement, audit, and regulatory examiners.
A prioritized roadmap of domain-level recommendations, suitable for board review and operational planning, with re-assessment cadence aligned to insurance renewal or regulatory examination cycles.
Four institutional stages, from initial conversation to verdict delivery.
Our team reviews your AI footprint, regulatory posture, and engagement timing. Tier recommendation follows the call.
We deliver a confidential tier sheet with the recommended tier and a draft engagement scope, accompanied by our institutional contracting framework.
Contracts are executed per institutional standard. Your team is provisioned into the AIRS assessment portal.
Our analysts conduct the engagement against the published AIRS v1.1 Standard. A 15% incentive applies on Year-2 re-assessment when initiated within 18 months at the same scope.
AIRS is built differently from full-service advisory engagements — by design.
Our methodology is published. Procurement, audit, and regulatory examiners can validate the AIRS v1.1 Standard independently — without consulting NDAs and without dependency on our team.
Engagements end with the verdict, the crosswalk attestation, and the roadmap. There is no embedded ongoing-advisory dependency. Re-assessment is by election, on a cadence aligned to your renewal or examination cycles.
Engagements are scoped to the work that matters — without the multi-month onboarding fees, ongoing-advisory retainers, or leveraged-pyramid staffing common at full-service advisory firms.
Scoping conversations are typically 30 minutes. A scoped engagement proposal follows within five business days.
Or email contact@aisecurityintelligence.com directly.